Showing posts with label new books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new books. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Quick On-the-Road One-Handed Note: The Rumpus for My Birthday

Learning to write lefty.

And to peck
at the keys like
a poet.

The political consequences of the shift. Minutely felt as they are...

Many thanks to The Rumpus editors, as well as poet and reviewer David Peak, for publishing a kind, insightful review of Occultations. I was alerted to the review by friends, and reading it offered me new insight into what the hell I was or was not doing. The close reading is gracious and welcomed. Thank you!

Such wonderful poets have new books out. I will now have to wait till teaching in New York is over to see these new works (each of which I've read parts of, and have deeply been affected by):

--Susana Gardner's Herso - Black Radish Books // finally Gardner puts down her amazing book arts talents, others' manuscripts, and releases this difficult, spectral, book of poems.

--Sarah Mangold's An Antennae Called the Body - Little Red Leaves Textile Editions // I love LRL, the work they publish and the time they put in curating works. I also love Mangold's work, have for several years ever since reading Household Mechanics. Can't wait to read this book.

--C.J Martin's Two Books - Compline // Speaking of LRL editors, Martin's work has had an enormous impact on my thinking and writing. One of the most well kept secrets in contemporary poetry (well, not for much longer). And to wit, Michael Cross's new press (hot damn!) has published the book. That's celebratory.

--Carlos Soto-Roman's Philadelphia's Notebooks - Otoliths // I'm super excited about this. Speaking of well-kept secrets. At least here in the US. Whereas in Chile and elsewhere, Carlos Soto-Roman's work has been widely circulating. This work is bound to be....


Philadelphia's Notebooks

Philadelphia's Notebooks (book)

Print: $14.95
Carlos Soto-Román writes from the center of Empire with a sense of play (game pieces included) and clinical examination. His book is the work of an artist/world citizen who critiques the daily interrogations that come with being a new immigrant. The fun fact that Ellis Island was greatly expanded with landfill in the late 19th -early 20th century provides a basis for Soto-Román's signage marking poetry's place in a disposable culture. There are workbook exercises that encourage creative ways to answer the calls for loyalty oaths with a demand for radical possibility the host country includes in its PR material. This work also includes what the USA brand doesn't advertise—isolation and moments of utter despair. It is a truly American poem in that it's internationally inflected, from George Perec to German cinema to self-immolators from all over the world. "Philadelphia's Notebooks" could not be a more artful and timely reminder that “Every heart is a revolutionary cell.”—Frank Sherlock


--Oh, and here's a photo of my grandparents Alimelech and Tzivia (Kazakhstani). According to my aunt, they were active leftist revolutionaries, until one or both were swept up in one of the region's pogrom's.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

BIG PELT TALIKE /Poetry at Pilot



I had a great time at Pilot Books, giving a talk and reading with Reg Johanson, as part of Big Pelt Talkie Series (and part of Poetry at Pilot March Small Press Fest).  Many thanks to Pilot Books, Summer, and William Owen, curator of Big Pelt.  Many thanks too to Reg and those who packed the small bookstore, sat either out of fear or--hopefully--interest for over 2 hours of difficult conversation, some poetry too.  

This was my first time (sadly) at Pilot, one of Seattle's treasures, a little cove of poetry books. The collection of work they have is quite amazing--not a ton of books, but extremely good picks, and I found myself wanting to spend all day in there or buying everything in sight.  From Wheelhouse contributor William Walsh's Question Struck, a hard to find book that I've been very curious (ha) about, to a great chapbook selection, I was kinda drooling.  Ended up going home with Kyle Schlessinger's The Pink, from Kenning Editions.  Oooh, this book is good. More on that later.

Reg gave a talk first (go to the link above and watch the video for a small part of it).  Really amazing, clear and thought-provoking recounting of how he built his new chapbook, Escraches (Argentine word for outrage, also the movement in Argentina of those who continue to protest the disappeared by picketing the houses of former officials, during the military regime, who murdered thousands of dissidents). The work begins (on the cover, as if, or as, a pamphlet): "struck him in the head with an ax relieving / themselves on the monument." More on this work as I go further into it, from which he read and which deals with site-specificity (spatial practices), develops a poetics of documentary poetry (working with both found and non-found materials detailing a localized event, here, among other occulted phenomena, organizing the protests against the Vancouver Olympics in the face of terrible and underreported atrocity), while wrestling with how to make room for the subjective "I," to allow its felt sense of wounding (the body's or identity's "symptoms") to become--to both withstand (embrace), and resist its wounds.  Working thru Joan Retallack's poethical pedagogy in relation to poetic practices, along with detailing some of the work I ended up discussing--site-specific and "re-articulatory" work by Kaia Sand, Laura Elrick, and David Buuck, Reg's talk was radicalizing, problematizing, and pleasurable--nothing pretentious or dogmatic about it. Which is how Reg is, who he is, and I admire this a great deal. Was great to see him again, much to think about with regard to his talk.

I promise I did not know what Reg was going to do ahead of time.  It was rather uncanny, tho, just how much our talks overlapped.  I crafted a too-long set of questions/concerns circling around the poetics of spatial practice and methods or tactics I used in "writing" Occultations, and which others (I mentioned the corporeal rituals of Hannah Weiner and read from an essay on Elrick's Stalk) used in (or as) their work. Here, I spoke at the tactical level, talked about such corporeal practices as show up in these poem-sections as behaviors that seek to amplify the body-as-ecosystem's socialized markedness, shape, imprinted-ness left by late capitalism, here, specifically, the surveillance industrial complex--the increasing privatization of law's "enforcement." Fantastic poet/artist/editor and former Michigander (!!) Joel Felix (who, due to my hermitage, I met for the first time there) asked challenging questions about whether, thru a kind of abjection of "this body," the "here," (or thru amplifying the abject already extant), it is possible to, as Robert Kocik, who I leaned on for this talk, writes, "make new behaviors" and thus discover new "functions."  And further, what those new behaviors would be--aside from speaking about them, where/what are they, have we arrived at any?  And finally, whether my set of moves, even as tactics, whether they speak to a poetics that implies some form of transcendentalism?  Tough questions, to which I didn't and don't claim to have answers.  Robert Mittenthal and my partner Elizabeth were helpful here in thinking out loud.   

Answers, of course, are orthogonal to our interests here, and so as Joel's questions were picked back up in the discussion portion of the evening, Nico Vassilakis quite rightly scratched his head and asked where this every-few-years anxiety about the use value of "poetry" comes from. With Nico pointing out (rightly, I think) that there's good reason to suggest the best thing poetry can do is do nothing.  A good reminder that a lack of some form of exchange value, or even use value beyond the thing in itself, if possible, affords a radical departure from normative discourses, vocabularies, in essence, the language of late capitalism.  So goes the argument that otherwise, the drive for (in my case) a Rancierean intermingling of functions/behaviors in the service of X often constricts our practices and potentially makes poetry more, not less, vulnerable to the heteronomous market. Though I basically agree with this point, as hell, for most of my scribbles I couldn't tell you what they are doing or why they are beyond that they had to come out this way, I don't think there is a contradiction in saying that the aesthetic event, poetry say, can be both in and for itself (an essentialist position) and, in yet another context, have use value beyond itself--given that all these terms are not fixed, fluid.  Further, there are too many people making strange and wondrous things to make a claim for "poetry" either way here, I think.  Or at least I wouldn't want to stray from the particular instance to the general.  Nor would Nico, I'd assume.  Good discussion, tho.  I really learned quite a bit from all who spoke up, went home puzzled and frazzled, which means something really good happened.  Oh, and did I say I also went home with Kyle Schlessinger's Pink?  






Sunday, March 14, 2010

Belladonna Release Party & Upcoming Readings



Thanks to Rachel Levitsky, Thom Donovan, and all the awesome folks at Belladonna Books, I'll be reading as part of the final Belladonna New Books/New Releases series, April 13.  This is the launch for my forthcoming book, Occultations (Black Radish Books).  I'm extremely lucky to have had the support of the Belladonna folks, as well as others who have written for the book in some way or another thus far--Joan Retallack, Thom, David Buuck, CA Conrad, Kate Robinson, and Laura Elrick.  It's been a really loving experience, both working with the aforementioned people on this project, as well as those in Black Radish Books, especially Susana Gardner, Kathrin Schaeppi, and Nicole Mauro, who have been and are still editing the work.  Plus, thru this experience I got to learn how to use Skype--which is my new favorite thing.

More exciting yet, I get to read alongside, thus hear new work from Eleni Stecopolous, Dottie Lasky, and Brenda Iijima.  Three people whose poetry has deeply influenced mine.  Three of the the loveliest people I know.  As I've written elsewhere, I've read bits and pieces of Eleni's and Brenda's new books, and am enamored.  And Dottie's  new work will come new to my ears, and so I'm pretty stoked about hearing what all have to contribute to the evening.  Trip home will be a heavy one: books, books, books.  

Anyway, info for the Belladonna reading is on their website and below.  Do visit their site, as not only are some of the most stunning books available there to purchase, but there is a complete reading series list, which includes events at AWP.  

Meantime, I'll be reading/giving a talk with Reg Johanson at Pilot Books this weekend (see post below) as part of the Poetry at Pilot events, and Big Pelt Talkie series.   

Hope to see you someplace soon.


UPCOMING EVENTS



Tuesday, April 13, 2010; 7:30 pm
Closing Event for Belladonna's
Year of New Releases

Dorothea Lasky
 (Black Life)
Brenda Iijima (revv. you’ll—ution & 
If Not Metamorphic 
)
Eleni Stecopoulos (Armies of Compassion
David Wolach (Occultations 
Dixon Place
161 Christie Street; New York City
$6.00

Friday, March 12, 2010

The Red Room: Writings from PRESS 1 Available Now


Thanks to poet-editors Arlene Ang and Jordan Schilling, the journal PRESS 1's first anthology of selected contributions, is now available for purchase here thru Amazon, and, I believe, SPD. I have just ordered the book, so more on its contents as it arrives.  But for now, a thank you to the editors.  PRESS 1, over the past few years, has put out several issues that combine image and text by introducing poets and visual artists to one another on the page.  So this aught to be a lovely 1st print collection.  An old poem from a manuscript I'm still tinkering with, called Of Some Velocity, appears in the journal.  This manuscript I come back to now and then and will probably for some time--as part, I think, of Prefab Eulogies (the larger project), Of Some Velocity has so far not died on the vine.  Anyhow, congrats to Arlene and Jordan and thanks for their hard work. 



Thursday, January 21, 2010

PRESS 2009-2010: Jules Boykoff & Kaia Sand



Join poet/activists Jules Boykoff and Kaia Sand for a tour of their latest work


                 


The Evergreen State College
Where: Sem II Building, Room C1105
    When: January 28, 7:30pm 

Boykoff and Sand helped organize the recent Econvergence conference in Portland (http://www.econvergence.org/). They are the founders of the Tangent Press and reading series in Portland (http://www.thetangentpress.org/readings.html) and co-authored a new book on guerrilla poetry entitled Landscapes of Dissent: Guerrilla Poetry and Public Space (Palm Press 2008). 
 
Boykoff is the author, most recently, of Hegemonic Love Potion (Factory School, 2009) and Once Upon a Neoliberal Rocket Badge (Edge Books, 2006). He has also published and lectured widely on the suppression of dissent in the United States. He is a contributor to scholarly journals like Antipode, Social Movement Studies, and New Political Science as well as popular publications like the Guardian, Common Dreams, and XCP: Cross Cultural Poetics. He was an  invited speaker at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Nairobi, Kenya (2006), where he presented research he carried out on U.S. media coverage of global warming.  

Sand is the author most recently of Remember to Wave, forthcoming this winter with Tinfish Press. This collection investigates political geography in Portland, Oregon, and contains a poetry walk she guides. Her  collection, interval (Edge Books 2004), was selected as a Small Press Traffic Book of the Year and she is also the author/designer of several chapbooks through the Dusie Kollektiv. She is a contributor to Jim Dine’s Hot Dreams series (Steidl Editions 2008) and recently performed poetry collaged entirely from the North American Free Trade Agreement at the Positions Colloquium of the Kootenay School of Writing in Vancouver, British Columbia. At present, she is at work on The Happy Valley Project, multi-media collaborations investigating housing foreclosures and finance.

           

Friday, January 8, 2010

Carla Harryman Interview





In talking with Charles Bernstein a couple nights ago (he gave a great reading here at Evergreen this week, & was good to see him, & Leonard Schwartz, who I hadn't talked to since taking the semester off), I found myself on the receiving end of a lot of insight regarding teaching / discussing the ideology of the classroom (and ideology generally) in the classroom.  Thanks much to Charles, who helped me add some needed texts to my syllabus.  It was a serendipitous discussion, as we're both teaching at moment, both classes circling around politics and pedagogy.  A couple current texts came up for discussions along these lines--both, we agreed, are some of the best new books of late.  One was, as I mentioned in another post, Disaster Suites by Rob Halpern.  The other, Carla Harryman's Adorno's Noise.  

I've long been struck by how little attention Harryman's work is given compared to her male counterparts.  Not that Harryman isn't a major influence for contemporary artists.  But yet again, Harryman and The Grand Piano are not usually mentioned in the same sentence.  Google these via Boolean search and you'll wind up with approximately 177 unique entries.  For Barrett Watten, you get nearly 400, same volume.  Not that lack of some vast popular/viral takeover is indicative of anything to any degree of interest beyond a passing one on this topic, but I've read Adorno's Noise, released last year by Essay Press, about a dozen times now, and still very much discovering things, getting a kind of static shock from it--even "Orgasm," an essay of all of about 50 words.  The work, like Harryman's other work, is extremely difficult to place, exacting, precise in its deliberations.  It's not just that my background is in philosophy of music; the book really is, beyond everything else it is, a study in the form of the essay (which makes Essay Press the best possible home for it, in my estimation). 

Well, I'm liking Bucharest at moment, at least the American Studies Program at the University there, specifically its undergraduate journal, Intersections.  There's a nice interview with Harryman in this latest issue.  Harryman's somewhat politic to linger on genre here as to why it is difficult to "place" her work.  Part of what I love--what's influenced my work a great deal--is this genre concern, where essay for Harryman deliberately meets poetry and prose, and where the written is embodied on the page and in the literal performance of much of her work (Neo-Benshi, and other poets theater conventions).  The difficulty of placement is an act of political resistance, and so one would, and should, and want to expect that work such as Harryman's is going to remain occulted by more commercialized texts (tho, think of how many options the bookseller has when trying to file the newly acquired Harryman book!).   Gender, quite simply, as has been discussed so often, is one culprit in Harryman's (at times) backgrounding.  Not just the gender divide within the Language Poetry culture of the 70s and 80s, but more generally, and now: we just love our male-identifying(ed) poets.  Can't seem to get enough of them.  

Well, glad to see this interview.  Glad it is so rich as well--thinking of using some of it along with Adorno's Noise in my classroom this year.  

Saturday, January 2, 2010

New News: Delete Press



In writing a review of CJ Martin's latest book, out from the new Delete Press, I asked Crane Giamo, one of the editors, for background information on Delete.  Martin's chapbook, WIW?3, part of a series, is startlingly good, really one of the best books of poetry I've read this year (which is why I'm SLOWLY writing a review of it), yet as amateur book artist, I couldn't help but delve into the object itself.  The book is beautifully constructed, coptic bound, the cardstock thick and letterpressed typesetting gorgeous.  Each comes with its own handmade sleeve (again, beautiful). All materials (I think) are recycled.  So, I emailed Delete and asked them what gave rise to this new press, as well as how they worked with CJ.  The latter will be another post--here I'll just say that Crane said they worked quite closely with CJ throughout on the design of the book. For now, I want to pass along what Crane forwarded me--fellow editor Jared Schickling's mission statement, or mini-essay-as-response to my question. 

Why Delete Press?

JARED SCHICKLING 

We start interning at a university-affiliated journal and notice a number of things right off the bat.  Despite advertising itself as a journal seeking “new” and “upcoming” writers, suggesting that unsolicited submissions have a fighting chance of getting through the selection process, the journal’spermanent editorial board solicits the vast majority of its published material.  These editors, English department faculty and staff, solicit work from writers they admire and from their friends, and it’s common for an issue to contain not one unsolicited poem.  Someone working in the field tells us one builds a successful journal through solicitations, which we believe is true.  Our problems are with the posturing of the journal and the quality of the work finally printed.  Most of the work that we see reach publication is mired in popular and established models of writing and thinking being pushed and explored in mostly prominent English departments.  We notice how many poems, often in obtuse ways, use all the coveted buzzwords of the day—“location,” “Other,” “cartography,” etc. 

 

But perhaps our biggest problem is the manner in which unsolicited manuscripts are treated.  They go through an evaluation process resembling an assembly line.  A row of graduate students read the same manuscripts successively—if at any point a reader doesn’t like one, that manuscript is rejected.  There is little conversation—one likes it or one doesn’t.  We notice that the most mild, broadly appealing poetry can get through all those different readers, many of whom seem new to the manifold worlds of innovative, contemporary, at times underground poetry of the past century. Furthermore, if at any time a manuscript manages to satisfy all of these readers, hungry and curious and perhaps easily excitable at “discovering” titillating poets and poetry, the work still has to pass that issue’s lead editor.  (Return to first point; and note that student readers are students of thepermanent editorial board.)     

 

The press that publishes the journal also runs an annual book contest.  We literally despise every book that wins, aware of the innovative, important, and more interesting work happening elsewhere at presses that aren’t asking reading fees, submitting artistic endeavors to a “contest,” nor offering cash prizes.  The contest model amounts to extortion.  Artists, such as many writers are, will produce and distribute their work in the absence of support from markets, academies and presses.  History shows this.  Writers don’t need presses.  Presses, however, need writers.  As we work with five different presses currently, we’ll add that we value the work many editors and publishers are doing.  They give us our books and digital media in aesthetically pleasing formats, and in this can do a great honor and service to a writer’s work.  They create space in which a work may live.  But how is it that we’ve arrived at a moment where publication with wide distribution, cash prizes, and the institutional praise attending that are the barometers by which the work of a press is valued and comes to be desired?  To suggest that this isn’t the case is to simply deny the actual situation.  We have a publisher friend who can’t tell us one title published by such-and-such press, but yet he wants his press to affiliate with theirs and be welcomed into its larger community of writers and presses—why?   And he requires, by requiring contest fees, that writers support him financially in his endeavor, as his press’s books aren’t selling as well as he’d like.  What values are exposed in this situation?  Presses requiring reading fees will argue it’s the only way to sustain their projects—but do we need presses that can’t sustain themselves by virtue of the work they’re producing?  Why do we go to presses?  What exactly are we looking for?

 

The problems with the contest model also include the nature of judging.  The ideal judge for a contest is one that meets with the press’s aesthetic, and one who is famous, making the contest look attractive to aspiring writers, thereby attracting more submissions and the accompanying fees.  The writer thinks, “If Eileen Myles or Billy Collins or…would only choose…endorse my work,” and thus, the winning manuscript will be one that conforms to pre-existing notions of what constitutes “winning” poetry.  It is not possible to run an “ethical” contest despite the lip service couched in the CLMPCode of Ethics.  The contest model of publishing is antithetical to the health and evolution of poetry and its forms.

 

We quit to work with a smaller press doing chapbook contests with the occasional full length.  The contests continue to prove disappointing—in six or seven contests we are excited for one manuscript, but the judge doesn’t choose it.  The founders of the press admit to publishing work in which they have no interest.  They hand their most important decisions over to someone whose interests are not necessarily in line with the publishers’ needs and desires.  So again the question, whom and what is the press serving?  All the while various ideas on how to publish work that excites us are mired in what ifs that are irrelevant, centering on how to create a popular and commercially viable press.  Instead of engaging in more satisfactory work, all we do is talk about it, a discussion accounting matters perpetually sidetrack.  A few of us talk it over and decide the nature of the aspiration—success, fame—is the problem, a dumb dream masking the fact that evolutionary poetry begins as an unknown, and often remains so throughout its author’s life.

 

We decide it will be possible to run a self-sustaining press by soliciting and publishing work we deem important.  Period.  The trick will be to choose truly (according to our lights) outstanding work, to put much care into the construction of the book, and to do this in small, limited edition print runs that don’t cost too much.  The measure of “too much” will be something we can’t afford funding out-of-pocket.  It may seem idealistic to suggest that a press doesn’t need to rely on reading fees in order to happen, that it can sustain itself on the quality of the work it produces, in light of how few consumers of poetry there are and the many presses they already know and can choose from.  But here we are with our first print run almost sold out and our money investment returned.  We put this next to our remembrances of boxes stuffed with contest winners and journals from ten years ago awaiting their readers.  We don’t try to account for the possible truth involved with our own dream, other than to say that we have faith that other readers and writers share our vision—where the quality of the work is all that matters—we have faith that there will be buyers for work that hasn’t thought once in terms of posterity, popularity or commerce. 

 

We won’t suggest that vanity and conflicting interests do not attend this experiment called Delete Press.  We benefit in ways that have little to do directly with its work, and we appreciate those benefits.  But we run the press with the interests of the press in mind, because we’re whores topoetry. 

 

Monday, December 21, 2009

CUNEIFORM Press Specials



Another beautiful press, edited/curated by Kyle Schlesinger, is offering some specials for the hole i days.  Kyle's one of the leading book artists among poet-editors, does beautiful work, and work that's for sale includes the below, as well as titles from Joanna Drucker, Ron Silliman, etc. You get the point.  Click on the left-linked blog roll spot for CUNEIFORM, and wash yourself of that dirty holiday feeling with a book or two...

CUNEIFORM FOR THE HOLIDAYS

Looking for a special holiday gift? A number of titles from Cuneiform Press are available from Small Press Distribution, including:


TED GREENWALD'S 3


DAN FEATHERSTON'S THE CLOCK MAKER'S MEMOIR

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Not another Tooth Brush Head Replacement, but...YPolita Press F-You Commercial Press Special!


Carrie Hunter, poet, editor of YPolita Press, and member of Black Radish Books, a collective press, is giving YOU the chance TODAY to give that last-minute, romantic, and together-forever GIFT of POETRY.  Chapbooks by Smith, Stamatakis, Barbara Jane Reyes...Oh, consumerism, my muse, I smite thee with thy verse... Get new titles here, and for about the price of an electric tooth brush head replacement. 


Saturday, December 19, 2009

Another Fuck the Holidays Special



How could we not include the always wonderful Tinfish in our list of small presses?  Especially when, available for pre-order, are new titles from Kaia Sand and Elizabeth Soto.  Soto's work is always good, so I imagine this book is a must.  And I'd read some of Sand's Remember to Wave, with Wheelhouse publishing a selection of the work for our PRESS Anthology--the work is awesome, daring, politically radicalizing and beautiful.

SCROLL DOWN for ordering details.

FROM TINFISH PRESS:


Tinfish Pre-Publication Sale (Please help us to cover print costs!)

We have two exciting books going to the printer this week:

Kaia Sand, REMEMBER TO WAVE, $16




Elizabeth Soto, EULOGIES, $14





Details here:


Pre-publication prices are $14 for Sand's book, $10 for Soto's, or $22 for both.

Please support our efforts to publish experimental poetry from the Pacific by pre-ordering these titles.

47-728 Hui Kelu Street #9
Kane`ohe, HI 96744

or via the "purchase" button on our website: http://tinfishpress.com

aloha, Susan M. Schultz
Editor & money-bags